Skip to content

TP:60 – Episode #1 (Part Two)

Not enough of a premiere for you yesterday? We definitely agree, and that’s why TP:60 takes it up another level with Part Two of the season premiere. Tune in as the guys sit down with Sean Gentille from The Sporting News and Joe Yerdon from NBC Sports’ Pro Hockey Talk to get all of the insight on what to expect from the rest of the NHL this year, including Marty Turco’s chances in Chicago and Brooks Orpik’s straying knees. Chris and Joe also re-hash their longtime college hockey debate and the entire gang weighs in on a “Who Would You Rather?” between Mrs. Mike Modano, Willa Ford, and Mrs. Mike Comrie, Hillary Duff.

TPL and TP:60 also want to congratulate Doug Houvener for winning the voting battle to determine the official logo for the show. The winning entry took home 56% of the vote, and we appreciate Doug lending his creative abilities to the show and giving us such an excellent logo.

Questions for us? Contact@theproductionline.us is your direct line into our ear.

11 thoughts on “TP:60 – Episode #1 (Part Two)”

  1. Dudes… Don’t forget that your audience is made up of a significant amount of women. Can we get some Red Wings man-candy for “Who Would You Rather?” next time? 😉

      1. lol… I’m sure you can bring on some guest interviewees. Though maybe you’re a little intimidated by some of the ladies’ hockey knowledge and cursing ability. 😉

        1. I get outclassed on a daily basis in the “hockey know” category, so that’s not really a big deal around here. Cursing, however…you’re going to have a real fight on your hands (should I end this sentence with “bitch”…too much?)…ma’am.

    1. Pingback: Big Red Machine » Blog Archive » The Jonathan Ericsson Watch - A Detroit Red Wings Blog

    2. I’ve listened to both podcasts, but I keep coming back to listen to the intro whenever I’m bored.

      Btw, I’m team Lizzie McGuire/Hilary Duff =P

        1. Thanks man. I’ve been following you guys and a lot of the other bloggers for a while now so it’s great to get in on the action =]

    Comments are closed.